This article contains a configuration example of a site-to-site, route-based VPN between a Juniper Networks SRX and Cisco ASA device. For additional configuration examples, see KB28861 - Examples – Configuring site-to-site VPNs between SRX and Cisco ASA. For related technical documentation, see IPsec VPN Feature Guide for Security Devices.
Virtual Tunnel Interface (VTI) support for ASA VPN module. The ASA VPN module is enhanced with a new logical interface called Virtual Tunnel Interface (VTI), used to represent a VPN tunnel to a peer. This supports route based VPN with IPsec profiles attached to each end of the tunnel. This article will deal with Route Based, for the older Policy Based option, see the following link; Microsoft Azure To Cisco ASA Site to Site VPN. Route Based. These were typically used with routers, because routers used Virtual Tunnel Interfaces to terminate VPN tunnels, that way traffic can be routed down various different tunnels based on a As the name implies a route-based VPN is a connection in which a routing table entry decides whether to route specific IP connections (based on its destination address) into a VPN tunnel or not. This routing statement is placed in the routing table of the firewall/router such as any other static/dynamic/connected routes. Here I'll attempt to give an overview of Cisco ASA's implementation of the static virtual tunnel interface (aka "SVTI", or "VTI" for short), also known more simply as "route-based VPN", and how to configure it on Cisco ASA firewalls.
SRX Series,vSRX. Understanding Traffic Selectors in Route-Based VPNs, Example: Configuring Traffic Selectors in a Route-Based VPN
For example, Cisco ASA added support for route-based VPN in version 9.7.1. The main difference between policy-based and route-based VPN is the encryption decision: For policy-based VPN there are firewall policies that have "encrypt" as an action. SRX Series,vSRX. Understanding Traffic Selectors in Route-Based VPNs, Example: Configuring Traffic Selectors in a Route-Based VPN A multi-site Azure VPN requires a Route-based connection, not the basic Policy-based connection. We got the VPN Gateway all set up for Route-based connections and confirmed that was still working; no dramas. After doing this, we started speaking to the co-lo. The first response from the co-lo was that the ASA 5505 didn’t support a Route-based May 18, 2018 · Learn about Cisco ASAv route based VPN (Demo connecting AWS and Azure) ASAv (AWS) crypto ikev1 enable management ! crypto ikev1 policy 10 authentication pre-share encryption aes hash sha group 2
Jun 05, 2020 · Policy Based IPSec Site to Site VPN Between a Cisco ASA 5505 & a Juniper SRX 100 - Duration: 26:32. Gareth Williams 3,161 views
Virtual Tunnel Interface (VTI) support for ASA VPN module. The ASA VPN module is enhanced with a new logical interface called Virtual Tunnel Interface (VTI), used to represent a VPN tunnel to a peer. This supports route based VPN with IPsec profiles attached to each end of the tunnel. This article will deal with Route Based, for the older Policy Based option, see the following link; Microsoft Azure To Cisco ASA Site to Site VPN. Route Based. These were typically used with routers, because routers used Virtual Tunnel Interfaces to terminate VPN tunnels, that way traffic can be routed down various different tunnels based on a